38 lines
1.6 KiB
Markdown
38 lines
1.6 KiB
Markdown
|
---
|
||
|
|
title: Challenge the rulings!
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# Purpose
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- Understanding of ways how criminalization of solidarity operates through state and judicial practices
|
||
|
|
- Sharpening personal lenses for recognition of state and police violence
|
||
|
|
- Reading legal texts with confidence and disrupting the inaccessibility of the legal language
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# Method: Discussion
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
...(in a human rights organization, in a classroom, at a coffee shop, round table, workshop, conference...) based on the analysis of the court ruling
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Time: 90 minutes and possibly more
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# Materials:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- Court ruling
|
||
|
|
- [Aliens Act](https://www.zakon.hr/z/142/Zakon-o-strancima)
|
||
|
|
- [Are You Syrious reaction at the European Parliament](https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=421640735307159)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# Guiding Questions for Analysis:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Questions of Comprehension:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- What are the facts entailed in this ruling?
|
||
|
|
- How this ruling relates to the Aliens Act and its provision on criminalization of solidarity?
|
||
|
|
- What is hidden in the ruling? What can we not read here? (personal motivation of Dragan i.e.)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Critical Questions
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- Why the Aliens Act does not protect Dragan? What kind of message are the courts delivering with this ruling?
|
||
|
|
- How does criminalization of solidarity look like in this particular case? What are the consequences Dragan and Are you Syrious must bare?
|
||
|
|
- Why is criminalization of solidarity harmful broadly and not just for Dragan and Are You Syrious?
|
||
|
|
- What are the ways to stand against such criminalization?
|
||
|
|
- What are the ways that more groups and individuals act similarly to Dragan and support migrants on their perilous journeys?
|