1.6 KiB
1.6 KiB
| title |
|---|
| Challenge the rulings! |
Purpose
- Understanding of ways how criminalization of solidarity operates through state and judicial practices
- Sharpening personal lenses for recognition of state and police violence
- Reading legal texts with confidence and disrupting the inaccessibility of the legal language
Method: Discussion
...(in a human rights organization, in a classroom, at a coffee shop, round table, workshop, conference...) based on the analysis of the court ruling
Time: 90 minutes and possibly more
Materials:
Guiding Questions for Analysis:
Questions of Comprehension:
- What are the facts entailed in this ruling?
- How this ruling relates to the Aliens Act and its provision on criminalization of solidarity?
- What is hidden in the ruling? What can we not read here? (personal motivation of Dragan i.e.)
Critical Questions
- Why the Aliens Act does not protect Dragan? What kind of message are the courts delivering with this ruling?
- How does criminalization of solidarity look like in this particular case? What are the consequences Dragan and Are you Syrious must bare?
- Why is criminalization of solidarity harmful broadly and not just for Dragan and Are You Syrious?
- What are the ways to stand against such criminalization?
- What are the ways that more groups and individuals act similarly to Dragan and support migrants on their perilous journeys?