38 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown
38 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
title: Challenge the rulings!
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Purpose
|
|
|
|
- Understanding ways how the criminalization of solidarity operates through state and judicial practices
|
|
- Sharpening personal lenses to recognize state and police violence
|
|
- Reading legal texts with confidence and disrupting the inaccessibility of legalese
|
|
|
|
# Method: Discussion
|
|
|
|
(in a human rights organization, in a classroom, at a coffee shop, round table, workshop, conference...) based on the analysis of a court ruling
|
|
|
|
Time: 90 minutes and possibly more
|
|
|
|
# Materials:
|
|
|
|
- A court ruling
|
|
- 
|
|
- video of [Are You Syrious's reaction at the European Parliament](https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=421640735307159)
|
|
|
|
# Guiding Questions for Analysis:
|
|
|
|
## Questions of Comprehension:
|
|
|
|
- What are the facts entailed in this ruling?
|
|
- How this ruling relates to the Aliens Act and its provision on the criminalization of solidarity?
|
|
- What is hidden in the ruling? What can we not read here? (personal motivation of Dragan, for instance)
|
|
|
|
## Critical Questions
|
|
|
|
- Why does the Aliens Act not protect [Dragan Umičević](https://www.portalnovosti.com/dragan-umicevic-kazna-meni-je-poruka-drugima)? What kind of message are the courts delivering with this ruling?
|
|
- How does the criminalization of solidarity look like in this particular case? What are the consequences Dragan and Are you Syrious must bare?
|
|
- Why is the criminalization of solidarity harmful broadly and not just for Dragan and Are You Syrious?
|
|
- What are the ways to stand against such criminalization?
|
|
- What are the ways that more groups and individuals can act similarly to Dragan and support migrants on their perilous journeys?
|